History: presentations

MAY, 22

Group 27: Despite the fact that it was the first presentation, it was very interesting and well organized.

Group 25: It was well organized and very interesting, and the members of the group did it really well.

Group 24: The information was concised and very useful.

Group 23: A good presentation, where we could see that the members had prepared it very hard.

Group 22: A efficient preparation and presentation of the main point regarding grammar, phonology and pronunciation.

MAY, 27

Group 21: They have talked about the semantic fields and the etymology of words but they would have focused more on pronunciation.

Group 18: They made a good awarding of the most significant points in Chaucer's features.

Group 17: It was very interesting that they included information about the three states that appear in the General Prologue (God, the King, and the people), and they also focused on the main important characters.

MAY, 29

Group 16: They focused in Chaucer's dialect, the changes from Old English and the main characters.

Group 14: It was a detailed presentation and they also included an audio of a little fragment of the General Prologue.

Group 13: Their presentation was an exhaustive analysis of Chaucer's characteristics and main features, and also we can emphasized that they read a fragment in Middle English showing a very good pronunciation.

Group 12: Now it is time to do a self-criticism of our own presentation. We recognized that we were so far from being the best group, but we are proud of our work, because we tried to underline the most relevant features of our text not being tedious.

Group 11: We spent a nice time while we were hearing their presentation.

Group 10: It was an interesting presentation because they tried to explain the phonological changes of the Great Vowel Shift , and they also went in depth talking about some historical facts that were not mentioned before, such as the Norman Conquest and the influence of Latin.